like if i were to join in an argument or wank, i'd always be anon for it. i feel like being logged-in unbalances things, both in the sense of people dogpiling because they already disliked that namefag (or are trolling for drama/attention) AND in the sense of people whiteknighting because they already liked that namefag.
so it seems fairer to discuss as anon. then people are judging based on your argument alone.
Re: Things you'll never admit unanon
like if i were to join in an argument or wank, i'd always be anon for it. i feel like being logged-in unbalances things, both in the sense of people dogpiling because they already disliked that namefag (or are trolling for drama/attention) AND in the sense of people whiteknighting because they already liked that namefag.
so it seems fairer to discuss as anon. then people are judging based on your argument alone.