part 353 whalers on the moon

[aphanon_meme]

We've been here over a year now! I can hardly believe it! Dreamwidth's been pretty good, I'd say, with almost no downtime to speak of and all that! Anyway... how is your spring going? Or I guess it's almost summer, isn't it? Hopefully it's been well! I've been catching up on work and new movies, all very exciting stuff, I'm sure.

Enjoy part 353!

Latest Page

View flat!

*There is a rules page here. Please read it before reading and posting.

*There is a contact post here. Please use it for contacting me privately.

*There is a meme calender you can use for tracking and listing meme events!

*Dreamwidth, unfortunately, no longer supports any type of anonymous image posting.

*If you would like the Dreamwidth layout to look more like Livejournal's, you can use this workaround for your browser

Note: All entries prior to Part 331 originated on Livejournal.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

when rping do you assume the person youre tagging has read your previous threads?

[yuuago]

Pretty much never. Maybe one or two exceptions, but in general - no.

ooc

[wild_kuken]

Aside from muns who I know we all follow each other religiously, generally not. But I try to only make an out of context reference to another thread if it's on the same page we're on anyway, otherwise I'll generally explain in [brackets] the reason behind her emotions/reactions. Especially true for history alts, and doubly if I'm threading with an anon, I have no idea what their background knowledge is so I'll try to explain her situation and contextualize her emotions/reactions.

Of course since we've gotten basically no new blood I do expect a little familiarity with her overarching CR, like if it's relevant I'll make reference to the fact she's sleeping with Austria. But that's it. That's the minimum level of pre-knowledge I assume and that's been going on for three years now lol.

[(Anonymous)]

No. Unless it was the two of us tagging. Then... yeah.

+1

[(Anonymous)]

That's the only time.

ooc

[kingkongeriget]

Only if it's from a previous thread with the same character, and even then I might just link it in case. If there's a thread in there related to a conversation going on in a current thread (example: if Norway asked him to have a talk with Iceland) I'd link the thread with that prior conversation.


Generally, though, I tend not to assume there's any knowledge of what this dude gets up to.

[(Anonymous)]

nope