aphanon_meme (
aphanon_meme) wrote2014-06-06 02:26 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
part 353 whalers on the moon
We've been here over a year now! I can hardly believe it! Dreamwidth's been pretty good, I'd say, with almost no downtime to speak of and all that! Anyway... how is your spring going? Or I guess it's almost summer, isn't it? Hopefully it's been well! I've been catching up on work and new movies, all very exciting stuff, I'm sure.
Enjoy part 353!
Latest Page
View flat!
*There is a rules page here. Please read it before reading and posting.
*There is a contact post here. Please use it for contacting me privately.
*There is a meme calender you can use for tracking and listing meme events!
*Dreamwidth, unfortunately, no longer supports any type of anonymous image posting.
*If you would like the Dreamwidth layout to look more like Livejournal's, you can use this workaround for your browser
Note: All entries prior to Part 331 originated on Livejournal.
Enjoy part 353!
Latest Page
View flat!
*There is a rules page here. Please read it before reading and posting.
*There is a contact post here. Please use it for contacting me privately.
*There is a meme calender you can use for tracking and listing meme events!
*Dreamwidth, unfortunately, no longer supports any type of anonymous image posting.
*If you would like the Dreamwidth layout to look more like Livejournal's, you can use this workaround for your browser
Note: All entries prior to Part 331 originated on Livejournal.
huh.
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: huh.
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 05:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: huh.
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)yes and no and kind of?
décolletage (aka gowns with low cuts) were pretty popular at certain points throughout the 1400s to the late 1700s.
http://www.gogmsite.net/_Media/ca-1615-1620-elizabeth-grey_med.jpeg
http://www.gogmsite.net/_Media/1605-anne-of-denmark-by_med.jpeg
http://www.gogmsite.net/_Media/1654_anne_bulwer_by_gerar-2.jpeg
http://www.gogmsite.net/_Media/1675ca-hortense-mancini_med.jpeg
I've a few websites where people say that court women wore dresses that fully exposed their breasts, but I've never seen any concrete evidence that this occurred outside of the women being painted with bare breasts or very low necklines. It was common for women, even noble women, to be painted with nipples showing or breasts showing in the 15th to about the late 18th century (though nipples were more popular than entirely bared breasts in the late 18th century). Especially if they were being painted as mythological figures or if the paintings were intended as private gifts. Showing breasts or nipples could also be a way to represent femininity and purity: in the late 17th century it was more common for mistresses and "loose women" to bare both breasts, with one breast or one nipple bared usually being a symbol for purity and grace.
In the 18th century, there are fashion plates with nipples showing: http://www.ekduncan.com/2012/03/naughty-side-of-18th-century-french.html And there are also many portraits of women, even very upper class women, with nipples peaking out. (Many of these fashion plates were censored when they were republished during the Victorian era.)
But there is no definite proof that women wore gowns with nipples showing while they were out and about. Fashion plates were art just as much as they were advertisements and the 18th century equivalent of fashion magazines, and a nipple showing was a way to highlight the softness of the breast and get a little wink wink to the viewer.
Some 18th century paintings show fichus and shawls worn with low cut dresses: http://www.gogmsite.net/reign-of-louis-xvi/subalbum-elisabeth-philippi/1782-madame-elisabeth-by-el.html which I think was more likely than nipples hanging out.
A lot of it, too, is up to personal morals and taste. And it wasn't one size fits all. Marie Antoinette for example was very modest and would only bathe wearing dressing gowns--but she has a few portraits with low décolletage, too, and even a miniature supposed to be her with a bare breast.
Re: huh.
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)and speaking of history being written by the future: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-demonization-of-empress-wu-20743091/?no-ist
Re: huh.
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 06:31 pm (UTC)(link)Re: huh.
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah, I mean, it's not like most women walked around with their breasts hanging out but exposing cleavage was pretty common for a few hundred years. During certain eras (that sweet sweet directory period in France) transparent gowns was in vogue for a tweeny weeny bit! But those. Victorians.*
*well in France it was Napoleon&co who didn't like the outlandish directory fashions but still
GET DRESSED JOSÉPHINE! YOU'RE NOT A MERVEILLEUSE!
Re: GET DRESSED JOSÉPHINE! YOU'RE NOT A MERVEILLEUSE!
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)if ladies want to wear dresses that show off their pert nipples who are you to deny them their LIBERTY
Re: GET DRESSED JOSÉPHINE! YOU'RE NOT A MERVEILLEUSE!
Sorry, I'm a misogynist douche from the 19th century, women are not people.
Re: GET DRESSED JOSÉPHINE! YOU'RE NOT A MERVEILLEUSE!
[He was a bit of a femenist.]
Re: GET DRESSED JOSÉPHINE! YOU'RE NOT A MERVEILLEUSE!
And I love women. Ask my mistresses. Especially the Polish one.
[Napoleon Bonaparte more like Dudepoleon Bronaparte.]
Re: GET DRESSED JOSÉPHINE! YOU'RE NOT A MERVEILLEUSE!
What Frenchman doesn't love women? Loving them is not the same as valuing them for more than their beauty. I have found they are quite adept at politics and economics.
[He's had more meaningful conversations with women in Paris than he has with men.]
Re: GET DRESSED JOSÉPHINE! YOU'RE NOT A MERVEILLEUSE!
[He gets kudos when he shoots angry mobs while you get to flee France. Watch out for the Napoleon Propaganda Machine.]
Re: GET DRESSED JOSÉPHINE! YOU'RE NOT A MERVEILLEUSE!
[He's the one everyone turns to when they realize living under your rule isn't as great as it seems after a few years. He outlives most of the governments, so he'll take that over ruling the country anyday.]
Re: huh.